Refer to the guide Setting up and getting started.
The Architecture Diagram given above explains the high-level design of the App.
Given below is a quick overview of main components and how they interact with each other.
Main components of the architecture
Main (consisting of classes Main and MainApp) is in charge of the app launch and shut down.
The bulk of the app's work is done by the following four components:
UI: The UI of the App.Logic: The command executor.Model: Holds the data of the App in memory.Storage: Reads data from, and writes data to, the hard disk.Commons represents a collection of classes used by multiple other components.
How the architecture components interact with each other
The Sequence Diagram below shows how the components interact with each other for the scenario where the user issues the command delete 1.
Each of the four main components (also shown in the diagram above),
interface with the same name as the Component.{Component Name}Manager class (which follows the corresponding API interface mentioned in the previous point.For example, the Logic component defines its API in the Logic.java interface and implements its functionality using the LogicManager.java class which follows the Logic interface. Other components interact with a given component through its interface rather than the concrete class (reason: to prevent outside component's being coupled to the implementation of a component), as illustrated in the (partial) class diagram below.
The sections below give more details of each component.
The API of this component is specified in Ui.java
The UI consists of a MainWindow that is made up of parts e.g.CommandBox, ResultDisplay, PersonListPanel, StatusBarFooter, TaskListPanel etc. All these, including the MainWindow, inherit from the abstract UiPart class which captures the commonalities between classes that represent parts of the visible GUI.
The UI component uses the JavaFx UI framework. The layout of these UI parts are defined in matching .fxml files that are in the src/main/resources/view folder. For example, the layout of the MainWindow is specified in MainWindow.fxml
The UI component,
Logic component.Model data so that the UI can be updated with the modified data.Logic component, because the UI relies on the Logic to execute commands.Model component, as it displays Person object residing in the Model.API : Logic.java
Here's a (partial) class diagram of the Logic component:
The sequence diagram below illustrates the interactions within the Logic component, taking execute("delete 1") API call as an example.
Note: The lifeline for DeleteTaskCommandParser should end at the destroy marker (X) but due to a limitation of PlantUML, the lifeline continues till the end of diagram.
How the Logic component works:
Logic is called upon to execute a command, it is passed to an AddressBookParser object which in turn creates a parser that matches the command (e.g., DeleteTaskCommandParser) and uses it to parse the command.Command object (more precisely, an object of one of its subclasses e.g., DeleteTaskCommand) which is executed by the LogicManager.Model when it is executed (e.g. to delete a task).Model) to achieve.CommandResult object which is returned back from Logic.Here are the other classes in Logic (omitted from the class diagram above) that are used for parsing a user command:
How the parsing works:
AddressBookParser class creates an XYZCommandParser (XYZ is a placeholder for the specific command name e.g., AddTaskCommandParser) which uses the other classes shown above to parse the user command and create a XYZCommand object (e.g., AddTaskCommand) which the AddressBookParser returns back as a Command object.XYZCommandParser classes (e.g., AddTaskCommandParser, DeleteTaskCommandParser, ...) inherit from the Parser interface so that they can be treated similarly where possible e.g, during testing.API : Model.java
The Model component,
Person objects (which are contained in a UniquePersonList object).Person objects (e.g., results of a search query) as a separate filtered list which is exposed to outsiders as an unmodifiable ObservableList<Person> that can be 'observed' e.g. the UI can be bound to this list so that the UI automatically updates when the data in the list change.Task objects (which are contained in a TaskList object).Task objects (e.g., results of a search query) as a separate filtered list which is exposed to outsiders as an unmodifiable ObservableList<Task> that can be 'observed' e.g. the UI can be bound to this list so that the UI automatically updates when the data in the list change.UserPref object that represents the user’s preferences. This is exposed to the outside as a ReadOnlyUserPref objects.Model represents data entities of the domain, they should make sense on their own without depending on other components)Note: An alternative (arguably, a more OOP) model is given below. TaskList implements the ReadOnlyTaskList interface, and has a UniqueTaskList that contains all Tasks. This allows TaskList to be implemented in a way that is consistent to how AddressBook is implemented, thus any benefits arising from the design decisions of Person also applies to Task. We are currently not adopting this model due to time constraints and the benefits are not immediately obvious.
API : Storage.java
The Storage component,
Model component (because the Storage component's job is to
save/retrieve objects that belong to the Model)Classes used by multiple components are in the seedu.addressbook.commons package.
This section describes some noteworthy details on how certain features are implemented.
The proposed grouping mechanism is facilitated by GroupedUniquePersonList. It extends UniquePersonList with task that are linked between the people of the same group. Additionally, it implements the following operations:
GroupedUniquePersonList#assignTask(Task) - Add task to everyone in the groupGroupedAddressBook#markTask(Index) - Mark task of everyone in the groupGroupedAddressBook#unmarkTask(Index) - Unmark task of everyone in the groupThese operations are exposed in the Model interface as Model#assignTaskToGroup(String, Task), Model#markTaskOfGroup(String, Index) and Model#unmarkTaskofGroup(String, Index) respectively.
GroupedUniquePersonList adds a new string called groupName to label each of their groups.
A new list of GroupedUniquePersonList will be added to the Model interface.
To add to the list of GroupedUniquePersonList, the Model interface includes Model#addGroup(String, List<Person>) and Model#addListOfGroups(List<Group>).
To remove to the list of GroupedUniquePersonList, the Model interface includes Model#removeGroup(String).
New operation are exposed in the Model interface are Model#addPersonToGroup(String, Person), Model#removePersonFromGroup(String, Person) and Model#deleteAssignedTaskGroup(String, Task) which would call UniquePersonList#add(Person), UniquePersonList#remove(Person) and UniquePersonList#deleteAssignedTask(Person)respectively.
Given below is an example usage scenario and how the grouping mechanism behaves at each step.
Step 1. The user launches the application for the first time. The list of the GroupedUniquePersonList will be empty if there are no groups stored in the storage.
Step 2. The user executes group gn/2103T gp/Ivan gp/Greg gp/Dave command to group Ivan, Greg and Dave from the displayed person list to one group. The group command calls Model#addGroup(String, List<Person>), which creates a new group with that contains the list of people that was indicated by the user.
Step 3. The user executes assigngroup gn/2103T gt/Task 1 command to assign a task named "Task 1" to the group named "2103T" from the group list. The assigngroup command calls Model#assignTaskToGroup(String, Task), which finds the group with the same name and assign that task to everyone that is in the group.
Step 4. The user executes addpersontogroup gn/2103T gp/Bob command to add Bob to the group named "2103T" from the group list. The addpersontogroup command calls Model#addPersonToGroup(String, Person), which finds the group with the same name and add the person to the group.
Step 5. The user executes removepersonfromgroup gn/2103T gp/4 command to remove Bob from the group named "2103T" from the group list. The removepersonfromgroup command calls Model#removePersonFromGroup(String, Person), which finds the group with the same name and remove the person to the group.
Step 6. The user executes deletetaskgroup gn/2103T gt/Task 1 command to remove a task named "Task 1" from the group named "2103T" from the group list. The deletetaskgroup command calls Model#deleteAssignedTaskGroup(String, Task), which finds the group with the same name and remove that task from everyone that is in the group.
Step 7. The user executes deletegroup gn/2103T command to remove the group from the list. The deletegroup command calls Model#removeGroup(String), which finds the group with the same name and remove that group from the list.
The proposed undo/redo mechanism is facilitated by VersionedAddressBook and VersionedTaskList. The VersionedAddressBook extends AddressBook with an undo/redo history, stored internally as an addressBookStateList and addressBookStatePointer. The VersionedTaskList extends TaskList with an undo/redo history, stored internally as a taskListStateList and taskListStatePointer.
Additionally, they implements the following operations:
VersionedAddressBook#commit() — Saves the current address book state in its history.VersionedAddressBook#undo() — Restores the previous address book state from its history.VersionedAddressBook#redo() — Restores a previously undone address book state from its history.VersionedTaskList#commit() — Saves the current task list state in its history.VersionedTaskList#undo() — Restores the previous task list state from its history.VersionedTaskList#redo() — Restores a previously undone task list state from its history.These operations are exposed in the Model interface as Model#commit(), Model#undo() and Model#redo() respectively.
Given below is an example usage scenario and how the undo/redo mechanism behaves at each step.
Step 1. The user launches the application for the first time. The VersionedAddressBook and VersionedTaskList will be initialized with the initial address book and task list state, with the addressBookStatePointer and taskListStatePointer respectively.
Step 2. The user executes addtask n/task1 … to add a new task. The addtask command also calls Model#commit(), causing another modified task list state to be saved into the taskListStateList.
Note: If a command fails its execution, it will not call Model#commit(), so the state will not be saved.
Step 3. The user executes add n/Brook … to add a new person. The add command also calls Model#commit(), causing another modified address book state to be saved into the addressBookStateList.
Step 4. The user now decides that adding the person was a mistake, and decides to undo that action by executing the undo command. The undo command will call Model#undo(), which will shift the addressBookStatePointer once to the left, pointing it to the previous address book state, and restores the address book to that state.
Note: If the pointers are at index 0, pointing to the initial state, then there are no previous states to restore. The undo command uses Model#canUndo() to check if this is the case. If so, it will return an error to the user rather than attempting to perform the undo.
The following sequence diagram shows how an undo operation goes through the Logic component:
Note: The lifeline for UndoCommand should end at the destroy marker (X) but due to a limitation of PlantUML, the lifeline reaches the end of diagram.
Similarly, how an undo operation goes through the Model component is shown below:
The redo command does the opposite — it calls Model#redo(), which shifts the pointers once to the right, pointing to the previously undone state, and restores the address book or task list to that state.
Step 5. The user decides that adding the person was not a mistake, and decides to redo that action by executing the redo command. The redo command will call Model#redo(), which will shift the addressBookStatePointer once to the right, pointing it to the next address book state, and restores the address book to that state.
Note: If the addressBookStatePointer is at index addressBookStateList.size() - 1 or taskListStatePointer is at index taskListStateList.size() - 1, pointing to the latest state, then there are no undone states to restore for the respective commands. The redo command uses Model#canRedo() to check if this is the case. If so, it will return an error to the user rather than attempting to perform the redo.
Step 6. The user then decides to execute the command listtask. Commands that do not modify the address book task list, such as listtask, will usually not call Model#commit(), Model#undo() or Model#redo(). Thus, the state lists and state pointers remains unchanged.
Aspect: How undo & redo executes:
Alternative 1 (current choice): Saves the entire address book and task list.
Alternative 2: Individual command knows how to undo/redo by itself.
deletetask, just save the task being deleted).Target user profile:
Value proposition: This app aims to help leaders to keep track of members of formed groups and their contact information. This app helps to keep track of individual and group tasks, deadlines and meetings, thus allowing them to have a better overview of the structure.
Priorities: High (must have) - * * *, Medium (nice to have) - * *, Low (unlikely to have) - *
| Priority | As a … | I want to … | So that I can… |
|---|---|---|---|
* * * | student | add personal tasks | keep up to date with the different tasks to complete |
* * * | student | delete tasks | |
* * * | student | mark/unmark the tasks as done/not done | keep track of tasks that are completed |
* * | group leader | assign tasks to individuals within the group | manage individual tasks |
* * | busy group leader | see an overview of all the saved task | save time |
* * | student | set deadline for my tasks | see which task need to be done earlier |
(For all use cases below, the System is the TeamTracker and the Actor is the user, unless specified otherwise)
Use case: Assigns a task
MSS
User requests to list of contacts
TeamTracker shows a list of contacts
User requests to assign a task to a contact
TeamTracker assigns the task to the contact
Use case ends.
Extensions
2a. The list is empty.
Use case ends.
4a. The task given does not exist.
4a1. TeamTracker shows an error message.
Use case ends.
Use case: Delete a task
MSS
User requests to list tasks
TeamTracker shows a list of tasks
User requests to delete a specific task in the list
TeamTracker deletes the task
Use case ends.
Extensions
2a. The list is empty.
Use case ends.
3a. The given index is invalid.
3a1. TeamTracker shows an error message.
Use case resumes at step 2.
Use case: Add a task
MSS
User requests to add a task to the list of tasks
TeamTracker adds to the list
Use case ends.
Extensions
2a. The given parameters is invalid.
2a1. TeamTracker shows an error message.
Use case ends.
11 or above installed.Team size: 5
s/o or the character ') are not supported under these constraints. We plan to loosen these constraints by accepting any character, as long as the given name is not blank.- characters and spaces. We plan to loosen these constraints by accepting these characters as well.addtask and edittask against invalid dates, where for example dates like 30-02-2024 is implicitly replaced by 29-02-2024, is counter-intuitive to the users. We plan to explicitly display an error message like Invalid date to the user whenever a non-existent date is given.Task priority can take either an integer or low, medium, high, and it should not be blank is inaccurate. We plan to make the error message also mention the range of accepted integers: Task priority can take either an integer between 1 and 3, or low, medium, high, and it should not be blank.The person index provided is invalid or The task index provided is invalid is too general. We plan to make the error message also mention which indices are invalid: The person index 2, 3, 4 are invalid, since mass ops fails whenever at least one of the provided indices is invalid.clear command which clears all persons in the address book.edittask command, where deadline can be removed from tasks by providing a blank by/ parameter.#006400) or forest green (#228B22) instead.Given below are instructions to test the app manually.
Note: These instructions only provide a starting point for testers to work on; testers are expected to do more exploratory testing.
Initial launch
Download the jar file and copy into an empty folder
Double-click the jar file Expected: Shows the GUI with a set of sample contacts. The window size may not be optimum.
Saving window preferences
Resize the window to an optimum size. Move the window to a different location. Close the window.
Re-launch the app by double-clicking the jar file.
Expected: The most recent window size and location is retained.
Deleting a person while all persons are being shown
Prerequisites: List all persons using the list command. Multiple persons in the list.
Test case: delete 1
Expected: First person is deleted from the list. Name of the deleted person shown in the status message. Timestamp in the status bar is updated.
Test case: delete 0
Expected: No person is deleted. Error details shown in the status message. Status bar remains the same.
Other incorrect delete commands to try: delete, delete x, ... (where x is larger than the list size)
Expected: Similar to previous.
Prerequisites: List all tasks using the listtask command. Multiple tasks in the list.
Test case: deletetask 1
Expected: First task is deleted from the list. Name of the deleted task shown in the status message. Timestamp in the status bar is updated.
Test case: deletetask 0
Expected: No task is deleted. Error details shown in the status message. Status bar remains the same.
Other incorrect deletetask commands to try: deletetask, deletetask x (where x is larger than the list size)
Expected: Similar to previous.
Prerequisites: List all tasks using the listtask command. Multiple tasks in the list.
Test case: edittask 1 p/low
Expected: First task is edited. Name of the edit task shown in the status message. The priority will be updated to LOW in this case.
Test case: edittask 0 p/low
Expected: No task is edited. Error details shown in the status message. Status bar remains the same.
Other incorrect edittask commands to try: edittask, edittask 1, edittask 1 p/very high, edittask x (where x is larger than the list size)
Expected: Similar to previous.
Prerequisites: One or more of the data files does not exist in the data folder.
Test case: tasklist.json is missing from the data folder on launch
Expected: TeamTracker should still launch and function as normal.
Other missing files: addressbook.json or both the data files
Expected: Similar to previous.